War Crimes, Hard Choices, and Harder Consequences: Part V

Sergeant John Diem: “We can only do our best to deserve the public’s trust.”

John Diem in Iraq
John Diem in Iraq

Sergeant John Diem had four hours to think about his decision.

War Crimes, Hard Choices, and Harder Consequences: John Diem’s Story

[Continued from Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.]

After Justin Watt told Diem about the war crime, Diem had guard duty. He had decided, within seconds of hearing Watt’s story, to report it. But then he sat in a guard tower, with hours to change his mind.

He didn’t know Watt had already reported the crime. As far as he knew, he would be the whistleblower. He knew the turmoil that would result from reporting it. Heads would roll, and not just the heads of those responsible. He initially brushed off Watt’s fears of retaliation, because he “just couldn’t see a firefight happening between American soldiers.” But he eventually realized Watt was right; the soldiers he reported might try to kill him. Diem was in the same platoon, and logically would face the same danger of retaliation.

And Diem could have just washed his hands of the whole thing. He thought Watt was going to report it anyway. Diem didn’t have to get involved at all.

But Diem never considered staying quiet.

When Watt told Diem about the murders, Diem saw only one course of action. He had to notify his chain of command. The probable second- and third-order effects of reporting the crime were obvious, and substantial. He never let those concerns affect his decision.

As soon as his guard shift was over, he went straight to his platoon sergeant and platoon leader and relayed Watt’s story. He intentionally went around his squad leader. He made the platoon leader tell him when he was going to report it higher. The report went up the chain exactly the way it was supposed to. Diem never doubted for a second that he had done the right thing. And he never worried about retaliation, either. He did what he had to do, and didn’t look back.

Watt and Diem shared traits which suggest Watt’s decision should have been as “simple” as Diem’s. In 2006 they were only twenty-three years old. Both are smart guys. Both had substantial combat experience. So why, I wondered, was Watt so terrified about reporting the crime, but Diem so calm about it?

Diem was calm partly because his circumstances were different. While Watt and Diem were both young, Diem was far more experienced and established. He was a veteran of the Iraq invasion and had been promoted to sergeant shortly before the 2006 deployment. Watt was a peer to the men who committed the rape and murders, but Diem, as a sergeant, was above and intentionally distant from them. He was there to lead soldiers, not to be their friends. And despite all the problems with discipline and failed leadership in first platoon, Diem still had a solid NCO network behind him. Watt only had the few people he trusted for support.

Strangely enough, nobody seemed angry at Diem for reporting the crime. Nobody I spoke to mentioned threats against Diem, and Diem says he was never threatened or rebuked. Apparently, nobody in the platoon expected him to do anything other than report it. Watt has been the target of much anger for his decision, but Diem seems to have been given a pass. Maybe that’s because Watt, as a lower-enlisted soldier, is viewed as having had a choice.

But Diem was, well, Diem. Nobody thought he would do anything but report it. Watt is seen as the whistleblower, Diem simply the conduit.

But I don’t think differences in their status or situation are all that made Diem so confident in his decision. I think Diem just believed so strongly in the mission and in what being a soldier means, he simply didn’t feel fear over doing the right thing. I suspect he wouldn’t have been scared even if he had been in PFC Watt’s shoes, rather than being a sergeant in another squad. Which doesn’t mean Watt shouldn’t have been scared, or that Diem would have been right not to be. It just means his confidence in his beliefs somehow transcends fear.

Iraq is Hell 118

 

Propper_Breach_300x100

In Blackhearts, Diem is described as a Dungeons and Dragons-playing nerd. Diem bristles at that depiction. So does Watt. Watt says, “Yeah, John plays computer games. And he’s an absolute killer in combat. The rock-steady tone he uses in phone conversations is the same tone he uses when someone’s shooting at him. He’s just a solid, unshakeable guy.”

None of the soldiers I interviewed about this incident are stupid. All are well above average intelligence, but Diem is brilliant. As a former armorer, range coach, tanker, scout and current intelligence soldier, I’ve made many good-natured jabs toward my “dumb infantry” friends. But nobody who spends ten seconds talking to Diem could even joke about him being stupid (during the recent FIFA championship he posted on Facebook, “I think the current uptick in soccer’s popularity is a fairly strong case for a considerable amount of slumbering nationalism present in the US population. We are just looking for an acceptable opportunity,” to which I replied, “Are you sure you’re infantry?”). Diem could be, and probably will be, a college professor someday, despite the fact that he doesn’t yet have a college education.

Some of the nonveteran public likes to view soldiers as poor, stupid, mostly minority kids who only joined the military because they couldn’t find a job. If they meet Diem, a profoundly intelligent man who willingly chose an infantryman’s life and four combat deployments, they’ll likely never buy that stereotype again. He truly believes in the Army and in soldiering. Like me, he’s not a blind idealist; he sees the problems that plague the Army, and recognizes institutional shortcomings that contributed to the Yusufiyah murders. Unlike me, he believes the solutions to those problems lie within Army doctrine, training and education. He’s self-assured, introspective, and brutally candid about leadership failures.

About his 2006 deployment, he says, “We did not deploy to win, we deployed to bring everyone home at the company level. Some junior leaders wanted to conduct combat operations but did not tie these operations to a coherent tactical vision. It was too reactive. For the most part we only did what we had to.”

Alone among the men I interviewed for this story, Diem chose to stay in the Army. And he’s not just staying for a paycheck, or biding his time until he can retire with benefits. He’s actively trying to make institutional changes that will prevent another incident like the one that destroyed an innocent Iraqi family and nearly tore his unit apart in 2006. He’s one of the few “true believers” I’ve met during my military and law enforcement careers.

I know a little about true believers. As a cop I helped train many officers how to respond to mass shooting incidents like Sandy Hook or Columbine. One thing we stressed to our students was belief in the mission; if you truly believed in what you were doing, you were less likely to hesitate when circumstances demanded action. An officer who thinks “I’m not dying for someone else’s kids” or “My only job is to get home at the end of my shift” isn’t who you want to show up when someone opens fire inside a school. You need an officer who believes in his heart that the lives of strangers’ children are just as precious as his own. You need someone who doesn’t view survival as the only indicator of success, you need cops who know that dying to defend the innocent is better than staying safe while innocents are slaughtered. You need true believers.

Many of us look back with envy at the warriors of World War II because, in our idealized view of that war, they epitomize the true believer. Yes, they faced horrible combat and staggering losses, much worse than what most of us Iraq and Afghanistan vets faced. But unlike our generation’s dubious struggles to create democracy for people who don’t want it, the causes during WWII seem pure. Hitler’s evil and the Imperial Japanese Army’s inhuman brutality were worth dying to defeat. As a child I often heard my parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles discuss family and friends who died in Europe or the Pacific. They never discussed those losses with bitterness or resentment. Yes, the deaths were painful and tragic. No, those young lives weren’t wasted. They died for a just cause.

In Iraq, I struggled to believe in the mission. My company had the unglamorous job of escorting supply convoys to various bases. We didn’t often escort material vital to the war effort, instead we usually guarded food and creature comforts. The objective truth was that we were risking our lives to ensure “fobbits” had weekly steak and lobster, the latest gangsta rap CDs and every XBox game known to man. And I was bitterly resentful about that. That made convoy missions harder for me, because I just didn’t think they were worth my life. I never tried to weasel out of one, but I never truly believed in their importance.

Afghanistan was, to a point, very different. I did believe in the mission. For most of my deployment I felt, should I have died there, it would have been worth it. The belief helped me through difficult times. During one fight, a captain simply suggested I help him do something vitally important. I knew, without question, this thing had to be done. We all would have died rather than leave it undone, and there was a very good chance we would die doing it. Because I believed so strongly in this task, I did it without hesitation. Looking back now, five years later, I don’t remember feeling any fear at all. I had accepted its importance. I understood that my life was worth less than this task. I was, for that short time, a true believer.

John Diem leads his life as a true believer.

After Diem reported the crime, he waited for the battalion commander to take action. Colonel Kunk’s decision to publicly berate and abandon Justin Watt wasn’t what he expected. He remembers watching Colonel Kunk’s convoy leave Watt’s patrol base and asking Kunk on the radio if he had Watt. He doesn’t recall saying “If you leave him there, they’ll kill him.” “I don’t think I’d say anything that hysterical,” he recently told me. “But I’m sure I said words to that effect.”

Over the next few days he watched the platoon and company crumble. The murderers, along with Howard and Yribe, were arrested. His platoon leader and company commander were relieved. When the company was sent to FOB Mahmudiyah, first platoon gathered in a tent, where Colonel Kunk told them what undisciplined, worthless pieces of shit they were. Soldiers angrily lashed back at Kunk, but Eric Lauzier remembers Diem’s steady, even statement of fact: “This platoon accomplished every mission it was ever assigned, sir.” To Lauzier, there was more “Fuck you, sir,” in Diem’s words than in any of the other soldiers’ furious replies.

Diem didn’t intend it the way Lauzier heard it. “The point wasn’t to tell Colonel Kunk to fuck off, though I can see how it was interpreted that way. The point was to remind everyone present that we were on the same side, and if we were failures, it was because we were pursuing Kunk’s guidance to the best of our ability. Basically, you don’t get to act like a tough guy when you are the one with the burden of command. Yelling at privates about operational level failures is like yelling at a dog for failing to graduate medical school.”

Not long afterward, Diem was on guard when the battalion operations officer was giving their replacements a tour of the FOB. As they stood mere feet behind Diem, the operations officer said, “This is first platoon’s area. First is full of fuckups and troublemakers, they’ve had nothing but problems since we got here.” Diem fumed silently, thinking, Hey asshole, I’m right here. You could at least say that somewhere else.

Eventually Diem came home from Iraq. He watched the legal dramas surrounding the crime and wasn’t sad to see the criminals punished. He deployed twice more, to Afghanistan. One of the Afghan deployments was just as trying as his 2006 Iraq tour. As he puts it, “I’ve had two very bloody deployments.” He’s analyzed the actions and leadership of many soldiers he served with. He’s extremely critical of what he sees as weakness, even if it’s understandable human weakness. Even if it’s his own.

John Diem today
John Diem today

“We needed leaders,” he says. “We didn’t need our officers and NCOs to be our buddies, we didn’t need them to be nice guys. Dead people who thought you were good dudes are still dead. We needed people who would take command and do the hard things that nobody wants to do. That would have prevented the Yusufiyah murders.”

Today Diem is a staff sergeant and recruiter. He joins Watt at Army events to speak about the crime, and hopes his efforts will someday lead to major institutional change. He feels a duty to tell people how the crime happened and what it meant, and to search for a way to prevent anything like it from happening again. He does these things for the Army that he loves, and for the American people he defends.

“We will never be worthy of the trust we’re given by the public,” he says. “We can only do our best to deserve that trust.”

Those are the words of a true believer.

This Friday: Eric Lauzier’s story.

[Links to Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part VI.]

If interested you can find the Blackhearts book on Amazon here.

breachbangclear.com_site_images_Chris_Hernandez_Author_BreachBangClear4Chris Hernandez Mad Duo Chris (seen here on patrol in Afghanistan) may just be the crustiest member of the eeeee-LIGHT writin’ team here at Breach-Bang-Clear. He is a veteran of both the Marine Corps and the Army National Guard who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He is also a veteran police officer of nearly two decades who spent a long (and eye-opening) deployment as part of a UN police mission in Kosovo. He is the author of White Flags & Dropped Rifles – the Real Truth About Working With the French Army and The Military Within the Military as well as the modern military fiction novels Line in the Valley and Proof of Our Resolve. When he isn’t groaning about a change in the weather and snacking on Osteo Bi-Flex he writes on his own blog, Iron Mike Magazine, Kit Up! and Under the Radar. You can find his author page here on Tactical 16.

Chris Hernandez

Chris Hernandez may just be the crustiest member of the eeeee-LITE writin’ team here at Breach-Bang-Clear. He is a veteran of both the Marine Corps and the Army National Guard who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is also a veteran police officer of two decades who spent a long (and eye-opening) deployment as part of a UN police mission in Kosovo. He is the author of White Flags & Dropped Rifles – the Real Truth About Working With the French Army and The Military Within the Military as well as the modern military fiction novels Line in the Valley, Proof of Our Resolve and Safe From the War. When he isn’t groaning about a change in the weather and snacking on Osteo Bi-Flex he writes on his own blog.


Chris Hernandez has 112 posts and counting. See all posts by Chris Hernandez

12 thoughts on “War Crimes, Hard Choices, and Harder Consequences: Part V

    • August 13, 2014 at 7:31 am
      Permalink

      Yeah, I heard he got it. That comes up later in the series. Not sure if he’s actually retired yet though.

      Reply
      • August 17, 2014 at 11:35 am
        Permalink

        That SONOFABITCH!!! One of his platoons goes monkey shit in the wind. And he gets a promotion. After haditha Col. Davis got fucked out of a star that he DESERVED. I knew Col. Davis personally. He was THE combat commander in Iraq at the time. He led from the front. Never Bitched out of leaving the wire. And always treated his men with respect even if they considered shitbags. To him if you wore the bird ball and hook you had a place in the club. He kept it straight and never bullshited us about what was expected and what we faced in the enemy.

        But Col. Kunk failed on every level possible as a combat commander. And he got a promotion? He must have one hell of an advocate. I hate the politics.

        Reply
  • August 12, 2014 at 2:47 pm
    Permalink

    This is gripping. Thank you.

    Reply
    • August 12, 2014 at 2:51 pm
      Permalink

      Thank you for commenting, I appreciate that. This is a hell of an interesting story, and hopefully my writing didn’t detract from it.

      Reply
      • August 12, 2014 at 3:06 pm
        Permalink

        I have told every Veteran I know to check this out and read it. I was stoked to see this post today, looking forward to Part 6. Great stuff man, keep up the good work!

        Reply
  • August 12, 2014 at 11:55 am
    Permalink

    You are doing a great job flushing out the details a little more than Blackhearts. I like how you are humanizing these people. Diem is a solid guy. I wish him the best. Up to this point I’d like to say thank you for retelling this story. Stuff like this gets lost over time. It needs to be ingrained in people so they learn. Fact is, the toxic leadership never really left the company, it just took different forms. Keep writing. I might use this as NCOPD material.

    Reply
    • August 12, 2014 at 12:01 pm
      Permalink

      Inked,

      I’m glad to hear you feel that way. After your first comment, I could tell you were understandably jaded about how the story would come across. Instead of just retelling the facts, I’m making my best effort to get the reader into these soldiers’ heads, to make them feel what the soldiers felt when they were faced with this situation.

      If you do use this as NCOPD please let me know how it goes. I’ve used it with my company, and the results were surprising.

      And hopefully the rest of my series doesn’t disappoint you. 🙂

      Reply
      • August 12, 2014 at 12:30 pm
        Permalink

        After I left that company, I’ve heard this being retold a million different ways by people “who know”, or “had a buddy there”, or whatever. People seem to shut up really quickly after I correct them and say I WAS there. Going after the sources like you have and flushing out the details is awesome.

        My blood boils to this day when I read about Kunk. He really only was looking for an eagle. Cared about no one but himself. All the CSM did was be a yes man. Couldn’t understand a fucking word that guy said anyways,

        Reply
        • August 12, 2014 at 12:42 pm
          Permalink

          I avoided mention of the CSM’s name, and intentionally left out a few other names because I didn’t want this series to be perceived as a bitch session against senior leaders. But Kunk was so central to the story, I felt I had to use his name. And I’m actually holding back a lot of my opinions on his leadership.

          The CSM is a mystery to me. When I read in Blackhearts that he blew up at first platoon about cigarette butts, while Tucker and Menchaca were missing, I about lost it.

          Reply
  • August 12, 2014 at 10:27 am
    Permalink

    Again, Thank you Chris for this truly insightful body of work.

    There is no way any one who has not served can grasp the primal importance of the NCO to any military organization. They are literally the engine that pushes the machine. They are also the “life jacket” that keeps a floundering unit afloat when forced to navigate the storm of combat and/or a vacuous command environment. I saw that as a private and I reveled in it as a W4. I have known many whom I would readily have assaulted the gates of Hell with.

    The mantle of command in today’s Army is a literal minefield of opportunities to see your career go up in smoke. The environment of political correctness and intolerance of mistakes is a pervasive pox on the creativity and insightfulness that a truly effective LEADER must exhibit. The current model of a mid-level commander is often more like an executive manager than a leader. Given the current manpower climate I would expect that paradigm to only become even more entrenched. But a Commander, any LEADER for that matter must, when in combat, be unwavering in commitment to the hierarchy of Mission, Troops, Me.

    The primary consideration will always be the mission. That must never waiver. But the LEADER who is in command is engaged in a never-ending mental loop of balancing residual risk with the needs of the mission. In short, he makes every effort to protect his troops and to set the stage for their success. He will be a training tyrant. Ask anyone that’s ever really played the game and they’ll agree that sweat before combat stems the flow of blood in combat. He will also make every effort to ensure that his troops are as well resourced as his powers of “beg, borrow, steal” allow. He will demand performance an accept nothing less while being tolerant of mistakes made with noble intent. The best ones I ever worked for were “true believers”, but they only drank the Kool-Aid, they didn’t manufacture it.

    In the (all too typical) absence of such a leader, it is the NCOs that bear the burden of trying to perform all those functions. Sadly, those with the legitimate horsepower to make such things happen have often been lobotomized into thinking that sleeves rolled down and boots bloused in a combat zone are more important than HESCO’s filled and latrines built. But the Army survives because there are just enough true believers to keep the boiler stoked. They work ridiculously long hours and sacrifice time and health to complete the mission and prepare for the next. We all, as Americans, owe them our eternal gratitude.

    If my young son should someday decide that his future lies in military service, I pray that there is a John Diem in his formation.

    Thank you SSG Diem for your service, your honor and your devotion to the principals of the military professional.

    Reply
    • August 12, 2014 at 10:44 am
      Permalink

      Thank you sir. I hoped this series would convey the importance of having people at all levels who are willing to do the right thing. The value of sergeants who are both tactically proficient and willing to do what’s right cannot be overstated. I’ll lmake sure Diem reads this, and I’m sure your words and insight will be appreciated.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *