WCW | The Confusion Behind S&W’s Model 1.5

The Smith & Wesson Model 1.5 revolver confuses many people, including wheelgun "experts." We'll clear things up.
October 31, 2018  
|  0 Comments
Categories: Musings
Tags: Wheelguns

Smith & Wesson, more so than any other firearms company, stick to the tradition of naming their handguns, particularly their revolvers, by numerical model numbers.

When most of us think of their .44 Magnum we think Model 29, or 629 if it’s stainless. The first models were all tip-ups or top breaks in calibers we seldom use anymore.

Or were they?

Recently we looked at the Model 1 which was the undoubtedly puny seven-shot .22 Short peashooter. The Model 3 was better known as the Schofield or Russian Model, and we’ll look at the Model 2 in the near future.

So what’s with the Model 1 1/2?

Before the classic Model 2 (which is almost always a .38 S&W top-break in either double-action or single-action) there was the Military Model 2, which was a tip-up, six-shot .32 rimfire made in small quantities for military types who regarded the popular .22 Short Model 1 about as effective as we would consider it today.

\S&W Model 2 Military

For some reason, Smith & Wesson thought a more genteel version was desired for non-military use so they made a slightly smaller version that looked the same, with a bird’s head grip and a reduced capacity five-shot cylinder.

See, that prejudice on “what a civilian needs” goes way back and doesn’t always come from Democrats.

Smith & Wesson 11232 Rimfire

The factory retroactively called it the Model 1 1/2, and that model was used to describe the tip-up five-shot .32 rimfire pistol which required removal of the cylinder to load and unload.

Smith & Wesson Tip-up

However, the rapid advancements in firearm and cartridge development of the late 19th century seem to have outpaced nearly everything that came out in the twentieth century. By the time the .32 Rimfire tip-ups were taking off, the top-breaks in the more reliable centerfire calibers were ready to go.

S&W 112 Center Fire

Top-breaks gave a much better advantage over the tip-ups. There was no fumble-fucking around with a latch at the bottom half of the front of the frame. This was replaced by a top latch in front of the hammer and beneath the rear sight.

S&W 32 SACF

As an added bonus, a star-shaped ejector moved rearward as the cylinder opened up and ejected the empties so a shooter could rapidly load the entire cylinder at once instead of having to remove the cylinder to manually knock out each empty with the under-barrel spike.

S&W Topbreak

The top breaks proved to be stronger and more accurate and were made as late as the 1940s. Col. Rex Applegate himself carried a later model well into the 1950s.

Still, when Smith & Wesson debuted its Single Action Centerfire .32 caliber top break, it referred to it as the Model 1 1/2, just like the older tip-up chambered in .32 rimfire.

150 years ago model numbers didn’t mean much as almost none of these early Smiths are stamped or otherwise marked as such. A shooter had to know the differences between ammunition type (centerfire vs rimfire for .32 S&W) as well as action type, in this case not so much as double or single action (though that would come soon enough) but between tip-up and top-break.

S&W Oldschool

The confusion did not really come into play until self-described experts tried identifying these old handguns for modern (that’s post-1950’s era) collectors.

Depending upon your resource you could be reading about a completely different revolver than the one the person trying to sell you is referring to. For the modern S&W collector we refer you to The Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson by Jim Supica and Richard Nahas for the utmost in clarity.

Buy guns online: Guns.com

Great deals on pre-owned guns.

⚠️ Some hyperlinks in this article may contain affiliate links. If you use them to make a purchase, we will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. It’s just one way to Back the Bang. #backthebang 

⚠️ Some hyperlinks in this article may contain affiliate links. If you use them to make a purchase, we will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. It’s just one way to Back the Bang. #backthebang 

 

 

Mike Searson

Mike Searson

About the Author

Mike “the Mook” Searson is a veteran writer who began his career in firearms at the Camp Pendleton School for Destructive Boys at age 17. He has worked in the firearms industry his entire life, writing about guns and knives for numerous publications and consulting with the film industry on weapons while at the same time working as gunsmith and ballistician. Though seemingly a surly curmudgeon shy a few chromosomes at first meeting, Searson is actually far less of a dick and at least a little smarter than most of the Mad Duo’s minions. He is rightfully considered to be not just good company, but actually fit for polite company as well (though he has never forgotten his roots as a rifleman trained to kill people and break things, and if you look closely you’ll see his knuckles are still quite scabbed over from dragging the ground). You can learn more about him on his website or follow him on Twitter, @MikeSearson.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Articles

Official Rules

Can Cooker Trailblazer gif. Reads: Turn up the heat. Trailblazer bundle. Only $80.  Order bundle.

Gun.deals: back Breach-Bang-Clear

Find what’s in stock, and where, and compare prices. 

⚠️ Some hyperlinks in this article may contain affiliate links. If you use them to make a purchase, we will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. It’s just one way to Back the Bang. #backthebang 

Get Patched In

Wretched Minion Patch