"Parallax Free" isn’t.

Today we’re bringing you through parallax and company claims of “parallax free” with explanations and actual testing. Scroll to the bottom for the video if you want to skip the boring stuff. 

Rainier Arms
Rainier Arms has all kinds of gun-building goodness…and they’re a member of JTF Awesome. 

As with many things we write about here, it all stemmed from a Facebook post. It went something like this:

“I really want an MRO, but Trijicon says it has some parallax. Why can’t they make it parallax free like everyone else?”

Why, indeed.

To be sure, the words “parallax free” have been penned in many a red dot sight (RDS) manual and repeated by just as many product representatives across the board. Today we’ll look into some of those claims, as well as define some terms. Before we go any further we should probably talk about the basics of exactly how a red dot sight works.

By a very large margin, the most common type of red dot is a reflector type. Bear in mind that this explanation will be very general and every manufacturer has their own nuances. Some have multiple lenses, others use different coatings etc., but the following applies to virtually all that you’ll come across.

How It Works

Inside your simple RDS is an LED emitter. This emitter shoots a beam of light at a glass or polymer lens. This lens has been specially treated to reflect red (or sometimes green–thanks China) light back towards the shooter but allow other wavelengths to pass through. The dot that you see when you turn on an RDS is that reflected light. It’s a bit of a different story with the EOtech and other holographic sights [pro tip: if it doesn’t have a laser inside, it’s not a holographic site].

Inside an EOtech is a diode that shoots a laser onto a folding mirror. From there it hits a collimating mirror to align the beam and it’s then directed to a holographic grating. This grating projects the hologram into the window and you see that trademark 65 MOA circle with a 1MOA center dot. As an aside, one of the reasons you’ll never see a holographic sight with the same battery life as LED reflected red dot sights is because it takes significantly more power to run a laser than a simple LED.

Basic Red Dot Function

Parallax \ˈpa-rə-ˌlaks\

Merriam-Webster defines parallax as: “the apparent displacement or the difference in apparent direction of an object as seen from two different points not on a straight line with the object“. Astronomers use parallax to determine the distances of celestial bodies by noting the changes in perceived positions of far-off objects when the Earth is on opposite sides of the sun. Before the days of GPS and laser range finders, naval vessels could use parallax to determine distances to targets. More practical to your everyday life, the depth perception you gain from having two eyes and binocular vision comes from parallax.

Another effect of parallax is that farther-away objects appear to move slower than they actually are. This is called motion parallax. Driving in the countryside provides ample examples. When you’re driving down a road, the fence posts will rip right by while a house or hills in the distance seem to meander alongside.

This is all fine and good, but what it means to a shooter is that under certain conditions the dot will appear to be someplace it isn’t. That isn’t good and can mean missed shots.

Shop Rainier Arms, Support Breach-Bang-clear
Support Rainier Arms (a member of JTF Awesome) and support yer favoritest Breach-Bang-Clear thereby.

Although the dot you’re seeing is just a reflection off of the front of your sight (or projected onto a lens in the case of an EOtech), it’s actually focused at a much further distance. Since you can see through the glass, the dot appears to hover on top of your target. Many manufacturers claim that their dots are focused at infinity. Now we know infinity to mean limitless or endless but optically it means that the dot appears to be projected at a very long distance called the vanishing point.

Imagine you’re looking down a straight length of train tracks. Even though the two rails are parallel, our visual perception is that they get closer together and then finally converge into a single line. That is the vanishing point.

Train Tracks | by Martin Cathrae

So long as your eye is perfectly aligned with your target and your red dot sight, it doesn’t matter what the focus distance of the red dot is nor the distance of the target; the dot will appear on the target exactly how it is zeroed. (notwithstanding height over bore, ballistic drop or wind, of course; you still have to do your part).

If you’re shooting from unconventional positions without firm cheekweld, or simply using the dot incorrectly and happen to have a vantage point away from the center of the window, it may be a different story. So long as your target and your red dot are on the same focal plane, you won’t experience dot shift or will have significantly reduced shift. However, if they aren’t on the same focal plane and you get weird with your viewing position, you can experience significant deviation with your dot.

Some conditions make parallax deviation worse. Usually, a red dot sight will have significantly more parallax with targets at closer ranges. A smaller, more crisp dot will appear to have more parallax than a larger, less-defined one. Generally speaking, the edges and corners are especially prone to parallax error because they are the maximum distance from the center of the optic window. Magnification also makes parallax more evident, which is why some magnified rifle scopes, especially those over ten or eleven power, have parallax adjustments built in. What this parallax adjustment actually does is allow the user to move the focal plane of the reticle in-line with the target, therefore reducing parallax error.

Now, some of these concepts are hard to depict with just text and photos, so I took the liberty of making a short video demonstration which you can watch below:

Dealing with Parallax

Have you ever seen 1x RDS with a parallax adjustment turret? Me either. There are several different methodologies that manufacturers employ to reduce parallax. One of them is focusing at infinity. Remember that perceived movement at longer ranges is reduced. A dot focused at infinity will have less apparent movement, especially with targets further than 50m away or so, than a dot focused at a closer range. A red dot sight with a smaller objective window will also have less parallax, simply because your vantage point can only deviate so much before you’re out of the window entirely. Many reflector setups will utilize a Mangin mirror, which is a concave lens that helps to ensure the dot stays in line with the body itself. This setup is especially useful for reducing parallax from lateral movement, though they still remain susceptible to deviations in vertical movement. No doubt there are several more methods.

Testing

Of course, I had to test this for myself. To do this I grabbed an assortment of loose red dot sights from the safe, a length of Picatinny rail, a vice, a camera, and a camera sliding rig, made a quick trip down to a local park and I was ready to go. A convenient tree was located 68m from the table where I was setting up and a target was placed. Each optic was first mounted to the Picatinny rail and then mounted in the vice. Next, the optic was aligned roughly to the target; being perfectly in the center of the target doesn’t matter so long as any perceived movement from parallax error could be tracked. Seeing as how the sliding rig could only demonstrate lateral parallax, the camera was squared and aligned within the upper portion of each optic window.

Yes, I am setting up one of the worst-case scenarios on purpose.

Optics tested were the following:

  • Aimpoint Micro H1 (4 MOA)
  • EOTech EXPS
  • Trijicon MRO
  • Leupold LCO
  • Trijicon RMR 01 (3.25 MOA)
  • $40 Tru-Glo Walmart Special

Want to place some bets? Here we go….

Yes, all exhibited parallax, even those marketed and advertised as parallax free. No, this test wasn’t exhaustive of every red dot on the market, but a common selection with prices ranging from $40 on the low end to $1,000 on the high. Just knowing the nature of what parallax is and how it works I will be legitimately surprised if anyone releases a useful truly parallax-free red dot.

parallax_refraction_magnification

Other Aberrations

When watching the video you may have noticed some other optical oddities aside from the simple parallax errors with some of the sights. Namely, changes in color rendition and optical refraction. Here’s an animated GIF from the Trijicon MRO if you didn’t catch it while watching the video:

MRO optical refraction

You can see there is definitely some refraction as the camera begins looking through the optic itself. Light gets refracted when it travels through a material that slows it down. More optically dense materials will refract more light. Sometimes this results in image shift, as when looking at objects into water, and other times it can result in magnification or other distortions. The configuration and type of lenses employed can and will result in different levels of optical density.

Colors can also appear peculiar when looking through an optic. A blue or green tint is not terribly unusual just due to any anti-reflective or other coatings used during production.  Of the optics tested, the EOtech was the only one that didn’t exhibit any of these aberrations, with the Leupold LCO being the best of the reflector-type sights. Anyway, these optical anomalies are not inherently bad, just something that was made exceptionally obvious while performing these tests.

Conclusions and Loose Rounds

Parallax exists. That said, it’s not all bad nor is it the end of the world–it’s just a simple fact of life. Bear in mind that parallax errors with quality modern optics are relatively small and may even require a specific set of circumstances to rear their ugly heads. With that said, I do wish more manufacturers would be upfront about their claims of “parallax free”. Maybe add an asterisk and then write in really small letters at the bottom: “provided that the target is at least X meters away and then only for lateral shifts“.

As always, I encourage you to be an informed consumer and to look at manufacturer claims with a healthy dose of skepticism.

SureFire (@surefire_llc) – because only assclowns and the ill-prepared misunderstand the value of light. [Check out @surefire_lifestyle too.] 


Declare for Morning Wood!

Come, stroll the awe-inspiring aisles of the Morningwood BazaarEarn the right to wear our sigil and speak our words.

Become a Patron!

If you wish to cite, syndicate, or curate our material, or if you’re wondering about our please be so kind as to read our Terms, Conditions, and Disclosures.
Take heed! We have advertisers, sponsors, and affiliate relationships with some of the companies you will be reading about (particularly, but not limited to, archival posts). If you purchase one of those items, we will get a small commission from the sale at no additional cost to you. A lot of work goes into Breach-Bang-Clear; by making your purchase through one of our portals you’ll be supporting our work. This will help us buy beer, bullets, and barbecue, and we won’t have to put pop-up ads and other such stupid shit into our articles to pay our expenses. 

DFM

Emeritus Dave Merrill wrote for Breach-Bang-Clear from late 2013 until early 2017, including a year as its Managing Editor. He departed our ranks in May of 2017 to accept a well-deserved position as social media manager for RECOIL Magazine. He is a combat veteran of the Marine Corps who describes himself as a "...former urban warfare and foreign weapons instructor for Coalition fighting men." Merrill's articles are well worth the time it takes to read them - there's a lot of knowledge tucked away in that skull.


DFM has 86 posts and counting. See all posts by DFM

8 thoughts on “"Parallax Free" isn’t.

  • Pingback:Your Hump Day Reading List for August 31, 2016 - www.GrantCunningham.com www.GrantCunningham.com

  • July 18, 2016 at 9:45 am
    Permalink

    All I know is for red dot type sights, I’ve never been let down by Aimpoint CompM4S, T1s, ACOGs and RMRs. I tried to like the EOTechs, but having to turn the damn thing on before I use it (hey hold on guys! No gunfight yet! Gotta turn on my EOTech!) and battery life pissed me off. My CompM4S can run for 5+ years, constantly on, with a AA battery? Sold.

  • June 17, 2016 at 3:58 pm
    Permalink

    Hey man, I was an 0311 with 2/1 and during my second deployment, I had a aim point comp m2. I just bought a lwrc ic enhanced and am putting the comp m4 on it. Is there any videos about that particular optic?

  • June 17, 2016 at 9:54 am
    Permalink

    I kept going back to Trijicons…..though I do like the EXPS

    If you are not really splitting hairs, between 50 -100m , its not a huge issue.

    Unless you are going all Wallyworld with your optics, is the magnifier version “Shifty Sights Part 2”

    gonna follow this?

    Easy way to see the shift though,

    Bad ass sound track.

  • June 17, 2016 at 8:26 am
    Permalink

    There I was on the second read through of a paragraph, when I decided to treat it like algebra and just accept that x is x and I don’t really have to know why it’s x. It just freaking is and I need to go with it. Then I hit the first video and it all made perfect sense. I finally get it. The second video clarified it further. Thanks for keeping it simple for those of us who are challenged.

  • June 17, 2016 at 12:27 am
    Permalink

    Question for you based on this research: I own a Trijicon MRO as well as a Leopold LCO. I have a Sig MPX (9mm) and a Noveske 16″ AR (300 blk). Is one of the optics better suited to one of the firearms over the other?

  • June 16, 2016 at 1:32 pm
    Permalink

    Was expecting Morgan Freeman to narrate. 2 thumbs down. Stick to text Merrill.

    • June 16, 2016 at 4:04 pm
      Permalink

      I was thinking more Avery Brooks, but I hear what you’re saying

Comments are closed.