Weapon Trivia Wednesday

WTW: The SW380 – Forgotten Pistol that Should Stay Thataway

Today’s opportunity for you knuckle-draggers to learn something comes courtesy of Daniel Defense.

WTW: The SW380 – a forgotten pocket pistol that should stay thataway
Mike the Mook

Today we’ll look at Smith & Wesson’s first pistol chambered in .380 ACP. Better known as the SW380, this little polymer framed pistol was produced for about eighteen months before it faded into obscurity.

Sometimes, a weapon disappearing into history is a good thing.

History

The Sigma series was Smith & Wesson’s first foray into polymer-framed pistols. These striker-fired models were a huge departure for the company, whose history was steeped in cartridge revolvers and metal framed hammer fired pistols.

Introduced in 1994, they were initially chambered in 9mm and .40 S&W. Designed for simplicity and economy, they were extremely similar to Glock pistols. They were so close that Glock took them to court, and after a number of lawsuits and cash settlements Smith & Wesson somehow prevailed.

A lot was happening in 1994. The Federal Assault Weapon Ban limited magazine size to ten rounds or less for civilians, but at the same time Concealed Carry Reform was on the rise in many states. With the limitation on capacity and the demand for smaller pistols, more companies started making small pistols in larger calibers as well as concealable “pocket autos.”

In 1995 S&W introduced a small concealed-carry style Sigma variant. The SW380, chambered in .380 ACP, held six rounds and was fitted with very rudimentary “guttersnipe” sights. It had a single-stack magazine and a large thumb cut-out in the base of the frame, to supposedly make magazine removal easier.

Design

Based on the lines of the Sigma, this was actually the only model we ever liked at first sight. Despite being diehard S&W collectors, it was the only one we ever bought. We even remarked how it looked like a “Tiny Glock” and hoped they would make one someday.

The Sigma Series would eventually evolve into the M&P and lose all the weaknesses of the SW380.

That is where the similarity ends.

The SW380 is a straight blowback pistol with a slide made of a zinc alloy known as Zamak. Many of us see this alloy as junk, but it’s probably enough for a small caliber pistol. Disassembly involves removing a roll pin in the slide. MSRP was around $300, with street prices of $220 to $250. It was plain to see to whom S&W was marketing these pistols: the reluctant gun owner who wanted something inexpensive and would only fire an occasional magazine or two over the years. S&W admitted the service life was about 2500 rounds.

We honestly don’t know if we hate the amount of light betweeb slide and frame more than having to fumblefuch with roll pins for disassembly.

You may be wondering why we would look at such a firearm like this, but the reason is simple. Numerous law enforcement officers and shooters who trusted the Smith & Wesson name for years bought these pistols based on the name. The sights were reminiscent of those found on the custom ASP and Devel pistols of only a few decades previous. People simply thought they were buying quality. But its numerous issues and poor sales led it to being dropped from production in 1996.

Function

Our SW380 has given us very few problems. We picked it up cheap for perhaps the only other reason someone should even consider this piece: to fill a void in the S&W collection.

It is a semi-interesting piece and there are some neat features to the SW380, such as the grasping grooves at the rear of the slide to aid in racking. The trigger safety and firing pin safety are scaled-down versions of those used on full size pistols.

The magazine release on the magazine’s base pad reminds us more of charging a cordless drill than loading or unloading a pistol. While this feature is well intentioned, it’s our biggest issue with the pistol after the cheap materials and short service life. It simply takes too long to remove the magazine.

Over the years Smith committed more dick-stepping with the infamous “Clinton Agreement,” and quickly went to “least favored firearms company” by most Second Amendment supporters.

Thankfully a good CEO took the company back and righted the ship. That agreement is now a dark footnote in history and the Sigma line eventually evolved into the M&P series. But if you see one of these twenty-plus year old plastic pocket pistols and think it might be a good backup piece or even primary carry piece, stay away.\
-Mike



Mad Duo, Breach-Bang& CLEAR!
Comms Plan
Primary: Subscribe to our newsletter here, get the RSS feed and support us on Patreon right here.
Alternate: Join us on Facebook here or check us out on Instagram here.
Contingency: Exercise your inner perv with us on Tumblr here, follow us on Twitter here or connect on Google + here.
Emergency: Activate firefly, deploy green (or brown) star cluster, get your wank sock out of your ruck and stand by ’til we come get you.


Previous ArticleNext Article
Mike the Mook
Mike “the Mook” Searson is a veteran writer who began his career in firearms at the Camp Pendleton School for Destructive Boys at age 17. He has worked in the firearms industry his entire life, writing about guns and knives for numerous publications and consulting with the film industry on weapons while at the same time working as gunsmith and ballistician. Though seemingly a surly curmudgeon shy a few chromosomes at first meeting, Searson is actually far less of a dick and at least a little smarter than most of the Mad Duo’s minions. He is rightfully considered to be not just good company, but actually fit for polite company as well (though he has never forgotten his roots as a rifleman trained to kill people and break things, and if you look closely you’ll see his knuckles are still quite scabbed over from dragging the ground). You can learn more about him on his website or follow him on Twitter, @MikeSearson.

1 Comment

  1. Had one. Probably put three mags through it, stuck it in the back of the safe until I used it for part of a trade for something else. I agree entirely with your assessment.